A place for general chat about the Jimny. Please make sure you post in the correct section on the site, this way it keeps the site tidy AND ensures you get a more relevant answer.

Suppliers/Dealers or anyone selling with a commercial view in mind CANNOT post here unless responding to a specific request of a member in a "wanted" post.

Suppliers include people "breaking for spares" on a regular basis, when purchasing spares members should ask a supplier what they contribute to the running of the forum particularly if contacted by a Private Message

Suppliers or Members who have contributed to the forum can be identifed by the
logo.

Factory Diesel Jimny

More
13 Jan 2015 13:07 #134994 by Rhinoman
Replied by Rhinoman on topic Factory Diesel Jimny
Engine technology and reliablility has changed massively over the years, those who are 'of a certain age' will probably remember the VW '100,000 mile club', these days we think nothing of 100,000 miles. We should have had engines more like the Ecoboost engines a few years back but the manufacturers were still pushing (at a premium) diesel technology.

Some Suzukis and a bunch of motorcycles.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • darthloachie
  • New Member
  • New Member
    Public
More
13 Jan 2015 13:45 #135000 by darthloachie
Replied by darthloachie on topic Factory Diesel Jimny
The eco boosts are only economical in the offical cycle tests ........suprise suprise

In real life use they are a lot thirstier (according magazine tests)

I guess its beacuse its a small engine with a turbo and turbos are always thirsty once they spool up

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • horam_jimny
  • New Member
  • New Member
    Public
More
13 Jan 2015 14:36 #135003 by horam_jimny
Replied by horam_jimny on topic Factory Diesel Jimny
Exactly, their designed around passing the low emissions tests whilst still being powerful enough to keep up with a traditionally bigger more thirsty engine. So at the low revs needed for the minimum emissions test they use hardly any fuel and look great but when driven hard they end up using more fuel that the bigger engine or at least way more than advertised. I thik the technology is pretty good and interesting but it is geared to make the most of the rolling road test rather than real worl economy and power delivery.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • TomDK
  • New Member
  • New Member
    Public
More
13 Jan 2015 15:35 #135012 by TomDK
Replied by TomDK on topic Factory Diesel Jimny

darthloachie wrote: The eco boosts are only economical in the offical cycle tests ........suprise suprise

In real life use they are a lot thirstier (according magazine tests)

I guess its beacuse its a small engine with a turbo and turbos are always thirsty once they spool up


A lot thirstier is a bit of an exaggeration.
Our Focus 1.6 Ecoboost 150 hbp is 16.9 km/l, real life consumption is more around 14.5 km/l. I know it is not like the official numbers but still acceptable if you ask me.

My Buddy's 1.0 125 bhp Fiesta is rated at 23.3 km/l. Real life consumption is around 18km/l, which is also acceptable in my world.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • darthloachie
  • New Member
  • New Member
    Public
More
13 Jan 2015 16:45 #135017 by darthloachie
Replied by darthloachie on topic Factory Diesel Jimny

TomDK wrote:
My Buddy's 1.0 125 bhp Fiesta is rated at 23.3 km/l. Real life consumption is around 18km/l, which is also acceptable in my world.


Thats the same as my wife's 1.4 Honda Jazz which is old tech from 2009

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • TomDK
  • New Member
  • New Member
    Public
More
13 Jan 2015 18:57 #135029 by TomDK
Replied by TomDK on topic Factory Diesel Jimny

darthloachie wrote:

TomDK wrote:
My Buddy's 1.0 125 bhp Fiesta is rated at 23.3 km/l. Real life consumption is around 18km/l, which is also acceptable in my world.


Thats the same as my wife's 1.4 Honda Jazz which is old tech from 2009


Great comparison ;)

An old engine that struggles to produce a bit more than 80 bhp and 119 Nm at 2800 rpm versus a modern 1.0 Turbo that produces 125 bhp and 170/200 Nm at 1400 rpm B)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.165 seconds
Joomla template by a4joomla
We use cookies to give you the best online experience. Please let us know if you agree to all of these cookies. Accepting the Cookies also accepts the Disclaimers for the website.