A place for general chat about the Jimny. Please make sure you post in the correct section on the site, this way it keeps the site tidy AND ensures you get a more relevant answer.
Suppliers/Dealers or anyone selling with a commercial view in mind CANNOT post here unless responding to a specific request of a member in a "wanted" post.
Suppliers include people "breaking for spares" on a regular basis, when purchasing spares members should ask a supplier what they contribute to the running of the forum particularly if contacted by a Private Message
Suppliers or Members who have contributed to the forum can be identifed by the logo.
Suppliers/Dealers or anyone selling with a commercial view in mind CANNOT post here unless responding to a specific request of a member in a "wanted" post.
Suppliers include people "breaking for spares" on a regular basis, when purchasing spares members should ask a supplier what they contribute to the running of the forum particularly if contacted by a Private Message
Suppliers or Members who have contributed to the forum can be identifed by the logo.
Polyurethane bushes good or bad
18 Oct 2025 12:58 #262360
by 300bhpton
Replied by 300bhpton on topic Polyurethane bushes good or bad
We have the Blue Polybush in a couple of Land Rover's on the farm. So far so good.
When I say not all poly bush are equal. Is that in the case of Polybush, they offer 3 different grades. Blue is soft, Orange similar to OEM rubber and Red for stiff/performance.
Super Pro also use varying grades, but don't normally tell you much about it.
Lots of cheaper ones could be anything, some will be good and some likely terrible.
When I say not all poly bush are equal. Is that in the case of Polybush, they offer 3 different grades. Blue is soft, Orange similar to OEM rubber and Red for stiff/performance.
Super Pro also use varying grades, but don't normally tell you much about it.
Lots of cheaper ones could be anything, some will be good and some likely terrible.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Lambert
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
18 Oct 2025 18:33 #262362
by Hughes
Replied by Hughes on topic Polyurethane bushes good or bad
From my experience, if they're cheaper than the OEM style replacement bushes, they're probably rubbish.
Then again, I haven't used them for many years, general no-name brand quality may have improved.
I personally don't see any advantage in using them over OEM style in my Jimny, if anything I would want more flexibility, but your application is different to mine.
My 2008 Jimny (nearly 200k kms) is still on all original bushes apart from castor correction in the front and the shock bushes. The original bushes I pulled from the radius arms to correct the castor are still sitting on my bench good as new.
Then again, I haven't used them for many years, general no-name brand quality may have improved.
I personally don't see any advantage in using them over OEM style in my Jimny, if anything I would want more flexibility, but your application is different to mine.
My 2008 Jimny (nearly 200k kms) is still on all original bushes apart from castor correction in the front and the shock bushes. The original bushes I pulled from the radius arms to correct the castor are still sitting on my bench good as new.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 Oct 2025 00:34 #262364
by fordem
Replied by fordem on topic Polyurethane bushes good or bad
Years ago I ran poly bushes on a sport hatch (a 1992 Suzuki Swift), the handling was absolutely amazing, ride comfort was non existent, and for a vehicle that saw only street use, I'd say the wear rate was horrendous, despite the fact that the bushes were frequently cleaned & lubricated with the correct grease to get rid of the constant squeaking.
My needs have since changed and I can't see myself using poly bushes in the future.
My needs have since changed and I can't see myself using poly bushes in the future.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Lambert
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.261 seconds