Are you building a Mud Monster or a Pavement Princess??
If so you can have your own thread in this section.
This section on other websites has led to arguments and contention. People are posting pictures of their pride and joy and therefore CONSTRUCTIVE comments only please!

Placek's 33" Jimny

  • TomDK
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
    Public
01 Feb 2016 10:11 #161629 by TomDK
Replied by TomDK on topic Re:RE: Re:Placek's 33" Jimny

Placek wrote: Opel omega shock absorbers are too soft :)


More likely to be the springs that are way to soft. Going as slow as you are in that video, shocks dont have very much impact on the risc of rolling over.

But the main reason is still too narrow tracked for the height. Get some spacers on and you'll do much better.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Placek
  • Topic Author
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
    Public
01 Feb 2016 10:12 #161630 by Placek
Replied by Placek on topic Placek's 33" Jimny

TomDK wrote:

Placek wrote: At least the rollcage has been verified positive :D


At least as long as you don't expect it to withstand a highspeed rollover or rolling down a hill.

I haven't built this car for highspeed competitions.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • TomDK
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
    Public
01 Feb 2016 10:18 - 01 Feb 2016 10:21 #161631 by TomDK
Replied by TomDK on topic Placek's 33" Jimny

Placek wrote:

TomDK wrote:

Placek wrote: At least the rollcage has been verified positive :D


At least as long as you don't expect it to withstand a highspeed rollover or rolling down a hill.

I haven't built this car for highspeed competitions.


Highspeed or not. For competition use you NEED a diagonal crossbracing in the main hoop.
As the cage is now it does not provide any real additional safety for the driver and co-driver. It just gives a bit more protection to bodywork when driving around trees and in a very slow rollover as we just say in the video.

For comp use, safety first. Always.
Last edit: 01 Feb 2016 10:21 by TomDK.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Placek
  • Topic Author
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
    Public
01 Feb 2016 22:39 #161677 by Placek
Replied by Placek on topic Placek's 33" Jimny
Yesterday tests. A friend's edit :)
vimeo.com/153833520

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Daniel30
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
    Public
01 Feb 2016 22:49 #161681 by Daniel30
Replied by Daniel30 on topic Placek's 33" Jimny
Great vid looks like your enjoying your monster jimny :)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Placek
  • Topic Author
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
    Public
02 Feb 2016 08:50 #161698 by Placek
Replied by Placek on topic Placek's 33" Jimny
I have wighted my Jimny: 3262 lbs (1480kg) fully tanked and ready to drive. Mass distribution to axles: 53% front, 47% rear.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
02 Feb 2016 10:43 #161700 by Busta
Replied by Busta on topic Placek's 33" Jimny
400kg heavier than standard! No wonder she's a bit unstable.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Lambert
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
    Registered
  • The quickest Jimny in Harrogate...(that I own)
More
02 Feb 2016 20:17 #161742 by Lambert
Replied by Lambert on topic Placek's 33" Jimny
I'd be more interested in the centre of gravity than the actual weight if it were mine what with the cage and the radiator up so high and then the body having relatively low resistance to roll with the big flexible suspension. Ok there's some low down mass provided by the weight of the tyres and axle strengthening but even so I would still be looking at getting as much weight as low as I could, as it trying falling over on every second corner would be quite tedious.

Good luck with the shake down though, I'm sure that you will find suitable solutions for some of it's little idiosyncrasies.

Temeraire (2018 quasar grey automatic)
One of the last 200ish of the gen3s, probably.
ADOS Attention Deficit Ooooh Shiny!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • GraphicX
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
    Public
03 Feb 2016 01:37 #161763 by GraphicX
Replied by GraphicX on topic Placek's 33" Jimny

Placek wrote: I have wighted my Jimny: 3262 lbs (1480kg) fully tanked and ready to drive. Mass distribution to axles: 53% front, 47% rear.


is that with or without you in the car ? the GVM of a jimny is only 1420kg so you're already in the red either way :unsure:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Placek
  • Topic Author
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
    Public
05 Feb 2016 09:32 #161893 by Placek
Replied by Placek on topic Placek's 33" Jimny
The suspension is a bit too soft, but flex does the job in rough terrain very well. That was the first test, I'm sure I'll improve few things in the future but for now I'd like to test the car in competition conditions and see how it'll do.
I'd like to avoid the half-measures because in the long term they are cost inefficient so probably in a year or two I will swap suzuki axles to toyota and go for coilover shocks, but that's expensive and after this build I am broke ;) and need some time before I will think about big investments.
So now I will have maximum fun from what I have but will keep all suggestions in mind for the future improvements.

And of course few photos :)

Command center:


New emblem:


And my favourite sticker :)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Placek
  • Topic Author
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
    Public
07 Mar 2016 08:18 - 07 Mar 2016 08:22 #163440 by Placek
Replied by Placek on topic Placek's 33" Jimny
These are my rear half-shafts after first competition :) I should start using my brain more often than my gas pedal, especially on a rocky surface...
Last edit: 07 Mar 2016 08:22 by Placek. Reason: typo

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Placek
  • Topic Author
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
    Public
21 Mar 2016 17:27 #164159 by Placek
Replied by Placek on topic Placek's 33" Jimny
The second competition was also not very successful - the A-radius turned out to be too weak and broke and the rear axle shaft with it.







A friend took a photo of me shortly after we packed our rig on the trailer. I wasn't very happy then ;)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.175 seconds
Joomla template by a4joomla