A place for more technical discussions. Please make sure you post in the correct section on the site, this way it keeps the site tidy AND ensures you get a more relevant answer.

General questions about springs and shocks height.

More
28 Nov 2023 11:10 #252428 by IICIIEII
Hello!

These days I was thinking about the different suspension options available for the Jimny and some other similar 4WD with rigid axles and I ended with a few questions that are quite general in nature. I looked around but I could not find a satisfactory answer, so I was wondering if you could shed some light about this.

It is my understanding that for the car to have the maximum flexing capacity the shocks should be compressed just 50%. This way, one of the wheels can go down half of the shock length while the other can go up the same distance before reaching the compression limit. When maximum flex is reached, one of the shocks would be fully extended and the other fully compressed.

However, I see that it is very common in the 40mm lift kits to sell shocks that are just 20mm longer paired with springs that are 40mm longer than the stock. At the same time, it is written in many places that regular height shocks are fine for springs that are up 20mm longer than the stock ones. However, if I was to combine a 40mm extended spring with a 20mm raised height shock, the shock would not sit in the middle, it would be a bit extended all the time and maximum theoretical flex could never be reached. Would it not make more sense to extend shocks and springs the same length? In other words, to combine a spring that is 20mm longer with a shock that is 20mm raised height, so maximum flex can be reached. I was thinking that maybe the reason for the other combination is that the people designing the lift kits are installing 40mm springs with 20mm shocks to compensate for the spring compression when the driver sits in the car and the vehicle is partially loaded, but in that case would it not be better to install higher rate springs?

Cheers!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
28 Nov 2023 12:17 #252429 by 300bhpton
Good questions. Although I personally feel there is no definitive answer. It really depends what you are wanting to achieve and use the vehicle for.

At the extreme ends of spectrum you get mud trucks, where ride height and clearance are often the most important factors.

https://truckandute.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/img_1286.jpg?w=768&h=511

They tend to have little extra droop and often limited up travel, although most will allow compression as they sometimes get air borne.

Other vehicles like Formula Off Road ride low to the ground for stability reasons. They tend to have more down travel than up travel.




What I'm trying to say is, it really depends.

For road modified 4x4s there is a trend to 'lifting' often with the belief that it allows you to fit over sized tyres. So this is where the market mostly aims kits at.

But most standard'ish road 4x4s often have limits in their design.

For instance, to get more droop a longer shock should typically allow this. But a longer open length also means a longer closed length. If the closed length is longer than the bump stop, you will top the shock out under full compression instead of hitting the bump stop. Which is uncomfortable and can break things.

So there is a limit to how much longer a shock can be. A way around this is to fit extended bump stops, which effectively just limit up travel. Reducing the total travel of the shock. Depending on many things, you may end up with the same or more overall travel. It will depend on what can be done within the dimensions of the upper and lower mounts between full droop and compression.

The next option would be to change the shock mounts to allow for a much longer shock absorber. But on the Jimny this is not so easy. The upper shock mount is inside the same cone mount as the spring on the chassis.



Which makes it very difficult to put a really long shock in there. You'd need major surgery or even relocate the shock to a new position.

On some vehicles like a Land Rover this is a lot easier as the shock mount is open and seperate.




To summarise. There is a physical limitation to what can be done on the Jimny. But also more importantly many kits are not aimed at improving flex or suspension travel (true with many vehicles, not just the Jimny) and are focused on lifting instead, while retaining a similar amount of travel as standard.

Also on the Jimny there is the front cross member brace that gets in the way if you have too much droop and the standard length of the brake lines. So some kits do not want to address these, allowing them to remain stock. But still wanting to offer a lift.

Therefore, when picking out what components you want to buy, it very much depends on what you want the suspension and vehicle to be able to do.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
28 Nov 2023 14:10 #252430 by yakuza
for the Gen2 Leaf sprung Jimny I have installed both OME and Traimaster 50mm lifts and they differ. The OME has shorter shocks, and the trailmaster longer shocks and bumpstops. The OME would not flex as much but had other qualities like a softer ride.

For the coil spring Jimny this might not be the same of course.

The thing with rigid axles is how the axles pivot around the bump stops when flexing. At full compression on one wheel the axle will push up against the bump stop creating a force that that push the other wheel down against the surface, giving you better traction.
Seems to work fine on the coil sprung Jimny :)

Norway 2005 Jimny M16A VVT, 235 BFG MT, 2" Trailmaster, ARB rear lck, 17%/87% high/low gears.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
28 Nov 2023 19:32 #252436 by Manxman
Great answer from 300bhp, only one slight addition - remember that lift won't improve under axle clearance, unless you fit bigger tyres (and I'd argue that there's little point lifting a vehicle unless you upgrade the rubber) - in which case the upwards compression could be limited by the bump stop and/or the spring compression and/or the bigger tyre fouling.. whichever comes first.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
29 Nov 2023 12:04 - 29 Nov 2023 12:04 #252460 by IICIIEII
Thank you for the really useful answers!

So I think I understand now why many kits raise the springs 40mm but the shocks just 20mm, possibly to prevent tyre fouling when people fit large rubbers on the Jimny. But, also, according to your answers, it seems to me that it should be perfectly reasonable to fit 20mm longer shocks with 20mm longer springs, so the original proportions are kept. This would allow one extra 1cm of flexing up and down, which is minimum, but still. The setup should be also fine to fit 215 75 R15 tyres, since these are like one extra centimeter in diameter, and this falls well in line with the body lift. At the end of the day, you would end with 1cm of extra clearance (due to the tyres) and 2cm body lift due to the combination of shocks and springs. Am I right?
Last edit: 29 Nov 2023 12:04 by IICIIEII.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
29 Nov 2023 15:57 #252477 by jackonlyjack
You can fit 215 75 15's on standard suspension
On standard wheels without spacers 
 

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.145 seconds
Joomla template by a4joomla