×
BigJimnyMeet (North) 2024 (12 Jan 2024)
BigJimnyMeet 2024
14th July 2024
Parkwood Nr. Leeds
14th July 2024
Parkwood Nr. Leeds
Booking now open - Discount for additional vehicles
Click HERE for details
Click HERE for details
×
A place for more technical discussions. Please make sure you post in the correct section on the site, this way it keeps the site tidy AND ensures you get a more relevant answer.
Ratios
- TonikallinnAye
- Topic Author
- Visitor
-
Public
27 Aug 2021 18:59 #237928
by TonikallinnAye
Ratios was created by TonikallinnAye
Got a 1999 Jimny with stock ratios on 31x10.5 mudders. Wondering if i should try my best to find 4.3 diffs or just get a 24% reduction high and low for the t-case. Anyone know the pros and cons of each? (I don't need incredible low gear capabilities, as this is my winter car) And which would give more power? At 90 KM/H (56mph, my legal speed limit), the fifth gear is kinda struggling on FLAT surfaces, good on declines, though
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- TonikallinnAye
- Topic Author
- Visitor
-
Public
28 Aug 2021 16:21 #237960
by TonikallinnAye
Replied by TonikallinnAye on topic Ratios
Yeah i checked up on that. I believe the difference is right around 15%, though. The car wheels are around 2.'' wider than stock, and heavier tires. The 15% and 24% reductions seems to cost about the same, mostly worried about what it would the revs would be at around 56-62 mph in fifth gear (fifth is 0.864:1 for this gen, not 1:1)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Roger Fairclough
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Registered
Less
More
- Posts: 1401
- Thank you received: 194
- Points: 7520.00
28 Aug 2021 21:12 #237978
by Roger Fairclough
Replied by Roger Fairclough on topic Ratios
Are the 31's of any practical use to you, and do they outweigh all the negatives?
If the answer is no, then I would suggest you revert to a more realistic wheel and tyre.
Roger
If the answer is no, then I would suggest you revert to a more realistic wheel and tyre.
Roger
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- TonikallinnAye
- Topic Author
- Visitor
-
Public
28 Aug 2021 23:06 #237980
by TonikallinnAye
Replied by TonikallinnAye on topic Ratios
Winters in Iceland are quite a thing to behold, especially the past 2 years. I definitely need them. Should have explained a bit better with ''being worried about rpm''. Obviously the rpm will be high, and fuel consumption will get higher, what im worried about is overdoing it. If i need the 24%, then i need it, and will get it, regardless of rpm and fuel usage. If it's overdoing it, it's overdoing it. That's kind of where i'm at at this point. I'll probably go for the 24%. Seem like i'd be around 3300 rpm driving my legal limit, and that should make the car drive alright
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Roger Fairclough
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Registered
Less
More
- Posts: 1401
- Thank you received: 194
- Points: 7520.00
29 Aug 2021 08:09 #237984
by Roger Fairclough
Replied by Roger Fairclough on topic Ratios
Yes, info. is key to getting the right answer. You will, inevitably, increase wear and tear especially in the hubs and brakes but these are things you will have to expect. Being Iceland, there is a wealth of knowledge on the technology for driving on ice and snow.
Roger
Roger
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
29 Aug 2021 17:22 #237996
by Busta
3.9/4.3=0.90 or 90%, so 10% lower gearing. Personally I'd always go for lower gearing over high. A few more revs at cruising speed will make barely any difference to economy but the improvement in driveability at low speeds is massive. Basically you have a choice between 10% more torque or 24% more torque.
The following user(s) said Thank You: TonikallinnAye
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.106 seconds